Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/18/1994
State v. Kelley
Citations
- 229 Conn. 557
- 643 A.2d 854
- 1994 Conn. LEXIS 162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that without evidence that the prior accusation of sexual assault was false, the proposed cross-examination of the victim on the accusation was not relevant
- holding that because the defendant could cross-examine both the victim and the constancy of accusation witness, his right to confrontation had not been violated
- holding that without evidence that the prior accusation of sexual assault was false, the proposed cross-examination of the victim on the accusation was not relevant
- holding that doctrine does not violate equal protection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Santaniello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-03· cited 352×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-08· cited 162×
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-11· cited 159×
- State v. WyrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-05-04· cited 110×
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-05-28· cited 96×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-04· cited 93×
- State v. WhipperSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-02· cited 89×
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-05-02· cited 74×
- State v. AliSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-06· cited 72×
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-13· cited 71×
- State v. RolonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-31· cited 69×
- State v. MorantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 60×
- State v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-09· cited 53×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-05-12· cited 50×
- State v. AponteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-27· cited 44×
- State v. HansenConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-09-19· cited 38×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri· 2004-07-01· cited 31×
- State v. ValentineSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-12-19· cited 30×
- State v. AngellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-11· cited 28×
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court· 1959-06-29· cited 1,385×
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,335×
- People v. LinzyNew York Court of Appeals· 1972-07-07· cited 262×
- Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-07-25· cited 176×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-09-07· cited 172×
- State v. DerricoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-10· cited 151×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-30· cited 133×
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-12-16· cited 123×
- State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-04-27· cited 121×
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-17· cited 112×
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-10· cited 108×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-08-01· cited 107×
- Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-07-26· cited 96×
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-18· cited 94×
- State v. BrigandiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-23· cited 91×
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-22· cited 89×
- State v. LubeskySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-03-19· cited 84×
- State v. DabkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-18· cited 81×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.