Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/28/2008

State v. Bryant

Citations

179 P.3d 1122
285 Kan. 970
2008 Kan. LEXIS 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the court satisfied the requirement by asking open-ended questions \to learn everything that was bothering\ defendant and \fully hearing\ complaints
holding that court did not abuse discretion in denying defendant’s motion to appoint new counsel where defendant claimed that current counsel had conflict of interest because he had filed disciplinary complaint against her
holding the district court adequately inquired by \asking open-ended questions\ and \fully hearing [the defendant's] complaints\
stating three factors to consider in determining whether a new trial should be granted
stating three factors to consider in determining whether a new trial should be granted
“An appellate court does not consider appended items which are not contained in the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.