Skip to main content

State v. Schreiner

Citations

  • 264 P.3d 1033
  • 46 Kan. App. 2d 778
  • 2011 Kan. App. LEXIS 156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the prosecutor's request to the jury to \find that intoxication is not an excuse for the behavior\ while technically a correct statement of the law was likely confusing to the jury
  • discussing voluntary intoxication as defense to aggravated indecent liberties with a child
  • party may not invite an error in district court and complain of the error in appellate court
  • \It is not the courts' business or function to add to or take away from the language of a statute.\
  • canon against surplusage \one aid\ rather than \cardinal\ rule in reviewing statutory language
  • applying the invited error doctrine to an alternative means claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Atcheson, Malone, McAnany

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.