State v. Nyhammer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that child's videotaped statement alleging sexual crimes \-given to a law enforcement officer investigating a crime-constitutes testimonial hearsay for Sixth Amendment purposes\
• explaining that police are not required to inform persons of their \suspect status\ because \sus pect status is not an objectively verifiable and discrete fact.\
• explaining that under A.G.D., the failure to inform a suspect who has already been charged at the time of interrogation of the charges against them renders the suspect's waiver \per se invalid\
• finding no Confrontation Clause violation in admitting child sex abuse victim's statement to police where victim testified at trial and was subject to cross-examination
• finding no Confrontation Clause violation where defendant chose \strategic course\ not to cross-examine victim about accusations in videotaped interview
• noting for purposes of administering Miranda warnings that the issuance of a complaint-warrant is \an objectively verifiable and discrete fact.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).