Arizona Supreme Court· 12/22/1978
State v. Rose
Citations
- 589 P.2d 5
- 121 Ariz. 131
- 1978 Ariz. LEXIS 313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting record did not reveal bad faith in holding that speedy trial time limits began anew upon refiling after dismissal
- “Having been the victim of a crime similar to one with which the defendant is charged does not mandate a venireman’s dismissal.”
- declining to excuse a prospective juror who was a victim of kidnapping, when the juror assured the court he could set his experience aside to sit on a separate kidnapping case
- criminal intent is simply the state of mind that coexists with the doing of an act
- criminal intent is simply the state of mind that coexists with the doing of an act
- by criminal rule, speedy trial limits begin anew absent bad faith by prosecution or prejudice to accused
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court· 1989-02-10· cited 676×
- State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-23· cited 189×
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 175×
- State v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-28· cited 135×
- State v. KiperCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-10-24· cited 124×
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court· 1982-04-13· cited 116×
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court· 1993-09-30· cited 113×
- State v. ClabourneArizona Supreme Court· 1984-10-31· cited 112×
- State v. HillArizona Supreme Court· 1993-01-14· cited 111×
- State v. GreenawaltArizona Supreme Court· 1981-01-23· cited 107×
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-13· cited 101×
- State v. McMurtreyArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 95×
- State v. EastlackArizona Supreme Court· 1994-11-03· cited 91×
- State v. LujanArizona Supreme Court· 1979-11-26· cited 80×
- State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-06· cited 75×
- State v. CocioArizona Supreme Court· 1985-11-07· cited 73×
- Curley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-03· cited 53×
- State v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-15· cited 47×
- State v. HueyArizona Supreme Court· 1985-05-21· cited 46×
- Quincy v. JOINT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 41, ETC.Idaho Supreme Court· 1981-12-01· cited 44×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 227×
- United States v. Arthur BarrettFirst Circuit· 1976-06-22· cited 185×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1977-02-24· cited 89×
- State v. SingletonArizona Supreme Court· 1947-07-11· cited 87×
- United States v. Carmine Persico, Salvatore Albanese, Ralph Spero, and Hugh McIntoshSecond Circuit· 1970-04-15· cited 84×
- State v. BurrellArizona Supreme Court· 1964-07-09· cited 72×
- State v. FlemingArizona Supreme Court· 1977-11-01· cited 67×
- United States v. Reginald Cochran, William Ronald Watson, and William Robert Bland,defendants-AppellantsFifth Circuit· 1974-10-07· cited 60×
- State v. NartenArizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-28· cited 60×
- State v. SorrellArizona Supreme Court· 1964-01-23· cited 60×
- State v. ChildsArizona Supreme Court· 1976-08-06· cited 56×
- Dorsey v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1923-03-31· cited 52×
- State v. BallesterosArizona Supreme Court· 1966-04-29· cited 46×
- State v. HardinArizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-08· cited 42×
- State v. MangrumArizona Supreme Court· 1965-06-30· cited 41×
- Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 41×
- United States v. James Leftwich Appeal of Clarence Frederick WrightThird Circuit· 1972-05-31· cited 40×
- State v. MaddenArizona Supreme Court· 1969-01-03· cited 36×
- State v. BoozerArizona Supreme Court· 1955-12-13· cited 36×
- State v. DukeArizona Supreme Court· 1974-01-31· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.