Skip to main content

State v. Rose

Citations

  • 589 P.2d 5
  • 121 Ariz. 131
  • 1978 Ariz. LEXIS 313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting record did not reveal bad faith in holding that speedy trial time limits began anew upon refiling after dismissal
  • “Having been the victim of a crime similar to one with which the defendant is charged does not mandate a venireman’s dismissal.”
  • declining to excuse a prospective juror who was a victim of kidnapping, when the juror assured the court he could set his experience aside to sit on a separate kidnapping case
  • criminal intent is simply the state of mind that coexists with the doing of an act
  • criminal intent is simply the state of mind that coexists with the doing of an act
  • by criminal rule, speedy trial limits begin anew absent bad faith by prosecution or prejudice to accused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.