Skip to main content
· 1/5/2012

State v. Kinkade

Citations

  • 270 P.3d 371
  • 247 Or. App. 595
  • 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address Fourth Amendment claim where the defendant made a “passing reference in his opening brief to the Fourth Amendment” but did not develop a “separate argument under the federal constitution”
  • declining to address Fourth Amendment claim where the defendant made “passing reference in his opening brief to the Fourth Amendment” but did not develop a “separate argument under the federal constitution”
  • declining to address Fourth Amendment claim where the defendant made “passing reference in his opening brief to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution” but did not develop a “separate argument under the federal constitution”
  • the defendant was not stopped when an officer walked up to him on the street, asked if he could talk with him, and then inquired if he could pat him down
  • no seizure resulted when an officer approached a defendant, asked if he could talk, asked if he would agree to be patted down, and then, after the defendant agreed, patted him down

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.