State v. Shropshire

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 6853

Syllabus

Following a bench trial, appellant was convicted of criminal damaging. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the admission of the victim's testimony concerning the content of a video recording when the recording itself was not produced or admitted into evidence. The trial court's admission of the victim's testimony regarding the content of a text message did not constitute plain error. The trial court did not err by allowing the introduction of other-acts evidence. The State presented sufficient evidence to support appellant's conviction. The appellant has not established ineffective assistance of counsel. Finally, reversal of the conviction is not warranted under the cumulative error doctrine. Judgment affirmed.