State v. Shropshire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that entitlement to the instruction of entrapment requires evidence of “governmental inducement” and the “defendant’s unwillingness to commit a drug conspiracy”
• “[A] trial court cannot be held in error for prohibiting a defendant from advising a jury not to follow the law as the trial court instructs it.”
• “[A] trial court cannot be held in error for prohibiting a defendant from advising a jury not to follow the law as the trial court instructs it.”
• “The evidence introduced by the state could raise the issue of defense without a defendant presenting anything and the state would then be required to disprove the existence of the defense beyond a reasonable doubt.”
• conspiracy may be proven by circumstantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).