State v. Jackson

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 2805

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's Crim.R. 29(A) motion at the end of the State's case. The State presented sufficient evidence that appellant had contacted the complainant in violation of a protection order. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting text messages, including an attached video created by appellant. The text messages and video were authenticated and did not constitute hearsay. Judgment affirmed.