Skip to main content

State v. Tomlinson

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2575

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B) application for reopening timeliness untimely good cause ineffective assistance of appellate counsel COVID-19 Pandemic lack of access to counsel lack of access to legal materials witness identification surveillance video Evid.R. 704 Evid.R. 701 ultimate issue. The untimely application for reopening was denied where the applicant failed to establish good cause to excuse the delayed filing. Even if the application was timely, it does not advance a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Judges: O'Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.