State v. Harberts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that the defendant may have attributed greater reliability to the polygraph than it perhaps deserved did not render his confession involuntary.
• redaction of inadmissible matters from otherwise relevant evidence may be permitted if the meaning of what remains is not significantly altered
• redaction of inadmissible matters from otherwise relevant evidence may be permitted if the meaning of what remains is not significantly altered
• redaction of inadmissible matters from proffered testimony may be permitted if the meaning of the remainingproffered testimony is not significantly altered
• redaction of inadmissible matters from proffered testimony may be permitted if the meaning of the remaining proffered testimony is not significantly altered
• officer’s false “implied” expert qualifications in administering polygraph test, and failure to disclose the exact scope of qualifications, did not render the defendant’s confes- sion involuntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).