Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/18/1994
State v. S.H.
Citations
- 75 Wash. App. 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Responding to a need for treatment is an appropriate basis for a manifest injustice disposition and is determined by the specific needs of the particular defendant.”
- \This section [RCW 13.40.210(1) ] by its own terms does not apply to manifest injustice dispositions.\
- “This section [RCW 13.40.210(1)] by its own terms does not apply to manifest injustice dispositions.”
- high risk to reoffend and the need for treatment are valid grounds for a manifest injustice disposition
- a high risk to reoffend and the need for treatment are valid grounds for a manifest injustice disposition
- high risk of reoffending one of several valid factors supporting a manifest injustice disposition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Grosse, Scholfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-04· cited 204×
- State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-11· cited 170×
- Campbell v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-21· cited 81×
- In Re Detention of CampbellWashington Supreme Court· 1999-12-14· cited 68×
- State v. BeaverWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-19· cited 56×
- State v. SHCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-18· cited 32×
- State v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-09-09· cited 31×
- State v. T.E.H.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-18· cited 30×
- State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court· 1998-01-28· cited 26×
- State v. B.O.J.Washington Supreme Court· 2019-10-03· cited 23×
- State v. T.E.C.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-05-24· cited 23×
- State v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-06-11· cited 20×
- State v. K.E.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-30· cited 18×
- State v. MoroCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-31· cited 11×
- State v. J.V.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-04-24· cited 11×
- State v. SledgeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-09-16· cited 10×
- State v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-08-26· cited 9×
- State v. MinorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-06-27· cited 4×
- State v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-08· cited 2×
- State v. JVCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-04-24· cited 1×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 2,433×
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 1,284×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-08· cited 629×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 407×
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 272×
- State v. RayWashington Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 172×
- In the Matter of Personal Restraint of PowellWashington Supreme Court· 2004-08-01· cited 121×
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-07· cited 114×
- State v. GreweWashington Supreme Court· 1991-08-01· cited 111×
- State v. OlivasWashington Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 98×
- State v. HandleyWashington Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 94×
- Nelson v. HeyneSeventh Circuit· 1974-01-31· cited 85×
- Harmon v. McNuttWashington Supreme Court· 1978-12-07· cited 72×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-27· cited 67×
- State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-07-23· cited 52×
- State v. TaualaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-05-08· cited 36×
- State v. TheilkenWashington Supreme Court· 1984-07-26· cited 34×
- State v. P.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-06-07· cited 33×
- State v. GaribayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-11-24· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.