Washington Supreme Court· 12/19/2002
State v. Beaver
Citations
- 148 Wash. 2d 338
- 60 P.3d 586
- 2002 Wash. LEXIS 797
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that there was no statutory limitation to the court’s discretion prior to 1979 when cross-reference to RCW 13.40.030 was added
- stating that in reviewing a statute, we give meaning, if possible, to every word contained in it
- “[w]hen the legislature uses different words within the same statute, we recognize that a different meaning is intended.”
- “When the legislature uses different words within the same statute', we recognize that a different meaning is intended.”
- \minimum term\ and \release date\ have different meanings within chapter 13.40 RCW
- “minimum term” and “release date” have different meanings within chapter 13.40 RCW
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court· 2005-02-10· cited 252×
- State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court· 2004-10-07· cited 128×
- Densley v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court· 2007-11-15· cited 105×
- State v. BeaverWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-19· cited 52×
- In RE LaHAPELLEWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 49×
- In re the Personal Restraint of LaChapelleWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 49×
- State v. LynchWashington Supreme Court· 2013-09-19· cited 40×
- State v. BornerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-08-29· cited 31×
- State v. T.E.C.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-05-24· cited 23×
- State v. HaggardWashington Supreme Court· 2020-04-23· cited 21×
- State v. MoroCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-31· cited 11×
- State ex rel. I.A.D. v. BaseCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-01-12· cited 10×
- State v. JacobCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-08-27· cited 10×
- Becerra v. City of WardenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-06-19· cited 9×
- In re the Welfare of B.D.F.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-30· cited 9×
- In Re Welfare of BdfCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-30· cited 8×
- State v. PoseyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-11-08· cited 8×
- Guillen v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-11-04· cited 6×
- State Of Washington v. S.D.H.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-04-13· cited 6×
- State v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-17· cited 6×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 208×
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-04· cited 204×
- State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-11· cited 170×
- State v. LundquistWashington Supreme Court· 1962-08-23· cited 80×
- Haley v. HighlandWashington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 80×
- State v. TaualaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-05-08· cited 36×
- State v. S.H.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-18· cited 33×
- State v. SHCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-18· cited 32×
- State v. BourgeoisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-01-24· cited 24×
- State v. B.E.W.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-27· cited 13×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of TapleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-01-10· cited 4×
- State v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.