Skip to main content

Campbell v. State

Citations

  • 139 Wash. 2d 341
  • 986 P.2d 771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sex offenders threaten public safety and therefore have reduced privacy interests, discussing disclosure of personal information
  • reliance on actuarial and clinical assessment proper and weight to be given evidence is question for the jury
  • instruction not comment on evidence if sufficient evidence to support it and it accurately states law
  • “the truncated privacy interests of the convicted sex offender” are outweighed by a substantial interest in public safety
  • instruction not comment on evidence if sufficient evidence to support it and it accurately states law
  • sex offenders threaten public safety and therefore have reduced privacy interests, discussing disclosure of personal information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Madsen, Sanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.