State v. Bingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the record showed “unrebutted evidence of prejudice sufficient to require removal” because the trial court “made no further inquiry” about a juror’s expressed predisposition to favor testimony of police officers
• “A juror’s inclination to credit the testimony of police officers more than other witnesses is grounds for dismissing the juror.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-04-11· cited 14×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Ingber
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-06· cited 74×
• State v. Brierly
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-04-16· cited 54×
• State v. Draper
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1984-09-11· cited 51×
• State v. Huerta
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 47×
• Uptain v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-12-09· cited 30×
• State v. Sexton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-11-02· cited 22×
• State v. Brosie
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-12-02· cited 18×
• State v. White
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1991-02-06· cited 10×
• State v. Huerta
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-07· cited 5×