District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/12/2001
State v. Scott
Citations
- 786 So. 2d 606
- 2001 WL 359539
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that appellee was not in custody even though police did not tell her she was free to leave where there was nothing in the record to suggest that her freedom of movement was curtailed in any manner
- concluding that appellee was not in custody even though police did not tell her she was free to leave where there was nothing in the record to suggest that her freedom of movement was curtailed in any manner
- “ ‘[I]n the absence of any indi-cia of coercion or intimidating circumstances, police questioning about criminal conduct or activity alone, does not convert an otherwise consensual encounter into a custodial interrogation.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pleus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PittsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-04· cited 54×
- Cillo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-07· cited 22×
- Hewitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-17· cited 10×
- Maxwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-06· cited 6×
- State v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-04· cited 6×
- Bannister v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-08· cited 5×
- State v. MyersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-17· cited 4×
- State v. E.W.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-29· cited 4×
- State v. FigueroaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-25· cited 3×
- State v. ShellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-07· cited 3×
- M.W.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-01
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. S. G.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-02-09
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-08· cited 250×
- Mansfield v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-03-30· cited 148×
- Caso v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-04-07· cited 105×
- Roman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 105×
- State v. CountrymanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-12-24· cited 94×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-06-05· cited 92×
- Triestman v. Department of Justice, Office of Professional ResponsibilitySupreme Court· 1998-01-26· cited 60×
- Eaton v. Dakota County Housing Redevelopment AuthoritiesSupreme Court· 2000-01-18· cited 54×
- Drake v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-10-27· cited 43×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-05-08· cited 39×
- Arbelaez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-23· cited 22×
- Ramsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-07· cited 15×
- Killian v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-28· cited 14×
- State v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-07· cited 4×
- State v. GillesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-29· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.