Skip to main content

State v. Paxton

Citations

  • 925 P.2d 721
  • 186 Ariz. 580
  • 214 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 45
  • 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the untimely disclosure of a witness, resulting in the witness’s preclusion during the State’s case-in- chief, did not require preclusion on rebuttal
  • “Evidence obtained in violation of the 10 Fourth Amendment need not be suppressed when that evidence 11 would inevitably have been discovered by lawful means.”
  • “Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment need not be suppressed when that evidence would inevitably have been discovered by lawful means.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberg, Contreras, Toci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.