State v. Stanley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where officer responded to a report of a possible robbery, knew that robbers may be armed, and defendant behaved nervously, officer safety justified frisk of defendant
• in officer’s experience, people who commit robberies often are armed
• in officer's experience, people who commit robberies often are armed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
• State v. Miglavs
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 56×
• State v. Dinsmore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-10· cited 27×
• State v. Rudder
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-17· cited 22×
• State v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-09· cited 20×
• State v. Cocke
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-04-18· cited 18×
• State v. Schwartz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-04-04· cited 15×
• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-31· cited 13×
• State v. Doyle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 8×
• State v. Henderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-06-15· cited 6×
• State v. Herrera-Sorrosa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-05-20· cited 4×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-23· cited 4×
• State v. Hayes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-01-29· cited 2×
• State v. Makuch/Riesterer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-12-11· cited 1×
• State v. Heater
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-29· cited 1×