Washington Supreme Court· 1/10/1991

State v. Schulze

Citations

804 P.2d 566
116 Wash. 2d 154
1991 Wash. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

clarifying Kruger by holding that exclusion of evidence-obtained in violation of a defendant’s right to counsel “is only warranted where . . . the evidence to be suppressed has been tainted by the violation”
“Jury instructions must be considered in their entirety to determine if there is reversible error in a specific instruction.”
\Jury instructions must be considered in their entirety to determine if there is reversible error in a specific instruction.\
toxicologist need not adopt a \cookbook\ of protocols and procedures for administering alcohol concentration tests but may, instead, adopt general criteria
toxicologist need not adopt a “ ‘cookbook’ ” of protocols and procedures for administering alcohol concentration tests but may, instead, adopt general criteria
WAC is sufficient to meet requirement of statute, and it is not court’s function to substitute judgment for that of toxicologist

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Schulze

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.