Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/9/1999
State v. Schulze
Citations
- 985 P.2d 1169
- 267 Kan. 749
- 1999 Kan. LEXIS 388
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the district court's conclusion that compelling financial circumstances existed and necessitated relief
- appellate court has jurisdiction to review restitution order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abbott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SkolautSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-05-16· cited 346×
- State v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-10-24· cited 24×
- State v. ShivelySupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-03-10· cited 16×
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-03-15· cited 14×
- City of Liberal v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-02-23· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RuffSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-03-05· cited 96×
- State v. BucknerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1977-11-22· cited 62×
- State v. MountjoySupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 38×
- State v. HinckleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1989-02-17· cited 37×
- State v. BeechumSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-05-22· cited 25×
- City of Overland Park v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-10-29· cited 22×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1965-12-11· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.