State v. Schulze

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The omitted facts are only material if there is a substantial possibility that had the magistrate been aware of the omission he would not have found sufficient probable cause for issuance of a warrant.\ (citing State v. Van Pieterson, 550 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pagan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
• State v. Reyes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-19· cited 2×
• State v. CHIQUET
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-22
• State v. Billington
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-14
• ANDREWS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-05-15

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Kurland
  California Supreme Court· 1980-10-30· cited 115×
• Carpenter v. Continental Trailways
  Supreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 101×
• State v. Gieseke
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-02-18· cited 35×
• Sotolongo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-07· cited 22×
• State v. Van Pieterson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-06· cited 17×