Skip to main content

State v. Fjermestad

Citations

  • 791 P.2d 897
  • 114 Wash. 2d 828
  • 1990 Wash. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “statutes should be construed to effect their purpose and unlikely, absurd or strained consequences should be avoided”
  • stating that unlikely, absurd, or strained interpretations must be avoided
  • stating that unlikely, absurd, or strained interpretations must be avoided
  • excluding both conversations recorded by unauthorized body wire and accompanying visual observations
  • excluding both conversations recorded by unauthorized body wire and accompanying visual observations
  • \[T]he State's privacy act ... deliberately places the court system between the police and private citizen to protect against this type of [electronic eavesdropping].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callow, Guy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.