Washington Supreme Court· 6/7/1990
State v. Fjermestad
Citations
- 791 P.2d 897
- 114 Wash. 2d 828
- 1990 Wash. LEXIS 66
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “statutes should be construed to effect their purpose and unlikely, absurd or strained consequences should be avoided”
- stating that unlikely, absurd, or strained interpretations must be avoided
- stating that unlikely, absurd, or strained interpretations must be avoided
- excluding both conversations recorded by unauthorized body wire and accompanying visual observations
- excluding both conversations recorded by unauthorized body wire and accompanying visual observations
- \[T]he State's privacy act ... deliberately places the court system between the police and private citizen to protect against this type of [electronic eavesdropping].\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callow, Guy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 632×
- State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court· 2003-02-20· cited 259×
- State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court· 2003-05-08· cited 174×
- Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 166×
- State v. RitchieWashington Supreme Court· 1995-05-11· cited 160×
- Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 151×
- State v. ChesterWashington Supreme Court· 1997-08-07· cited 141×
- Morris v. BlakerWashington Supreme Court· 1992-01-02· cited 130×
- Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 124×
- State v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court· 2002-11-07· cited 120×
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 118×
- State v. SweetWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-15· cited 100×
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court· 2007-01-09· cited 99×
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 99×
- Thurston County v. Cooper Point Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 2002-11-21· cited 84×
- State v. McDougalWashington Supreme Court· 1992-12-10· cited 82×
- Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 2007-08-02· cited 81×
- State v. CurranWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 73×
- Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 68×
- State v. SchulzeWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 60×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,569×
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-07· cited 308×
- State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court· 1983-03-10· cited 291×
- State v. WetheredWashington Supreme Court· 1988-05-12· cited 138×
- State v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court· 1980-05-29· cited 130×
- United States v. Donald Lee KappermanEleventh Circuit· 1985-07-01· cited 121×
- Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court· 1986-12-31· cited 119×
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1980-10-09· cited 101×
- State v. StannardWashington Supreme Court· 1987-09-24· cited 89×
- Nisqually Delta Ass'n v. City of DuPontWashington Supreme Court· 1985-03-07· cited 57×
- State v. O'NEILLWashington Supreme Court· 1985-05-30· cited 55×
- State v. ArangurenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-12-30· cited 54×
- State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-07-09· cited 46×
- State v. RothenbergerWashington Supreme Court· 1968-04-18· cited 45×
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-04-29· cited 17×
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1974-09-12· cited 13×
- State v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-05-05· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.