Skip to main content

State v. Schmidt

Citations

  • 867 S.W.2d 769
  • 1993 WL 433069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that landowners are not entitled to compensation based on diversion of traffic, reduced visibility from passing traffic, or circuity of travel
  • holding damages common to community as they differed only in degree, not kind, of injury
  • holding that damages for decrease in market value due to traffic diversion, increased circuity of travel to the property, lessened visibility to passersby, and the inconvenience of construction activities were noncompensable when they were considered community injuries
  • characterizing the Court’s holding in Fox as having “rejected” highest and best use as a material consideration in an impairment of access inquiry
  • noting requirement of compensation for damages to the remainder required since very early in this State’s history
  • noting requirement of compensation for damages to the remainder required since very early in this State’s history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hecht, Doggett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Schmidt

156 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.