Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/31/1986

State v. Schmidt

Citations

342 S.E.2d 401
288 S.C. 301
1986 S.C. LEXIS 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating \this Court will not review alleged error of the exclusion of testimony unless a proffer of testimony is properly made on the record\
stating the court of appeals generally will not review alleged error of the exclusion of testimony unless a proffer of testimony is properly made on the record
evidence is inadmissible unless it tends to make more or less probable some matter in issue upon which it directly bears
evidence is inadmissible unless it tends to make more or less probable some matter in issue upon which it directly bears
evidence is relevant if it tends to establish or make more or less probable some matter at issue upon which it directly or indirectly bears
Evidence is relevant if it tends to establish or to make more or less probable some matter at issue upon which it directly or indirectly bears

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwell, Ness, Gregory, Chandler, Finney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.