Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/14/2000
State v. Schmidt
Citations
- 100 Wash. App. 297
- 996 P.2d 1119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- not ex post facto violation when amended statute increased number of crimes constituting felonies
- the purposes of the ex facto clause are to ensure that legislative acts give fair warning of their effect and prevent arbitrary and potentially vindictive legislation
- the purposes of the ex facto clause are to ensure that legislative acts give fair warning of their effect and prevent arbitrary and potentially vindictive legislation
- regulations can be applied to past conduct without violating the ex post facto clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Morgan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SchmidtWashington Supreme Court· 2001-05-17· cited 61×
- State v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-03-16· cited 49×
- State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-12-15· cited 17×
- In re the Estate of HavilandWashington Supreme Court· 2013-03-14· cited 15×
- In Re RivardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-07· cited 4×
- State v. HyltonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-09· cited 4×
- In re the Personal Restraint of ForbisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-10-14· cited 4×
- In Re ForbisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-10-14· cited 3×
- State v. RivardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-07· cited 3×
- In re Estate of HavilandWashington Supreme Court· 2013-03-14
- State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-16
- State v. SchmidtWashington Supreme Court· 2001-07-13
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 2,057×
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court· 1798-08-17· cited 1,860×
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 1,651×
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,316×
- United States v. WardSupreme Court· 1980-08-22· cited 969×
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court· 1925-11-23· cited 945×
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 732×
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1937-05-17· cited 556×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 407×
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 303×
- Russell v. GregoireNinth Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 193×
- State v. AhoWashington Supreme Court· 1999-04-22· cited 148×
- State v. HandranWashington Supreme Court· 1989-07-25· cited 134×
- Doe v. PatakiSecond Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 133×
- United States v. Willie A. NewmanSeventh Circuit· 1998-05-20· cited 128×
- Cases v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1942-11-27· cited 125×
- In the Matter of Personal Restraint of PowellWashington Supreme Court· 2004-08-01· cited 121×
- Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court· 1986-12-31· cited 119×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.