Skip to main content

State v. Schmidt

Citations

  • 100 Wash. App. 297
  • 996 P.2d 1119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • not ex post facto violation when amended statute increased number of crimes constituting felonies
  • the purposes of the ex facto clause are to ensure that legislative acts give fair warning of their effect and prevent arbitrary and potentially vindictive legislation
  • the purposes of the ex facto clause are to ensure that legislative acts give fair warning of their effect and prevent arbitrary and potentially vindictive legislation
  • regulations can be applied to past conduct without violating the ex post facto clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.