Skip to main content

State v. Schmidt

Citations

  • 323 P.3d 647
  • 2014 WL 1663367
  • 2014 Alas. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that superior court “must make sufficient findings to permit meaningful review of an attorney’s fees award”
  • remanding trial court’s award of attorney’s fees under Rule 82 and statute for constitutional claimants because award was too vague to allow appellate review
  • remanding trial court’s award of attorney’s fees under Alaska Civil Rule 82 and statute for constitutional claimants because award was too vague to allow appellate review
  • reading the tax exemption statute and the Marriage Amendment to create two classes: opposite-sex couples for whom tax benefits are available, and same-sex couples for whom such tax benefits are unavailable
  • reading tax exemption statute and related regulation together with Marriage Amendment and concluding two classes are created: opposite-sex couples for whom tax benefits are available and same-sex couples for whom such tax benefits are unavailable
  • “The words of the tax exemption statute and regulations create a classification between married couples and unmarried couples.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carpeneti, Eastaugh, Fabe, Maassen, Stowers, Winfree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.