State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying motion for continuance when movant fails to pursue discovery diligently
• holding that when a party is prevented from obtaining discovery because he failed to act timely, that is a “predicament of its own making” and the “risk” a party takes by not “diligently pursuing discovery”
• stating that failure of litigant to diligently utilize the rules of civil procedure for discovery purposes will not authorize the granting of a continuance
• stating that failure of litigant to diligently utilize the rules of civil procedure for discovery purposes will not authorize the granting of a continuance
• noting that complaint of a ruling granting a motion in limine presents nothing for review
• providing that whether impairment of access is material and substantial is question of law, not of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).