Arizona Supreme Court· 4/25/1973

State v. Schmid

Citations

509 P.2d 619
109 Ariz. 349
1973 Ariz. LEXIS 346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

suggesting “publicity” of sensitive information like guilt or innocence, existence and contents of confessions and admissions, identity and credibility of witnesses “may result in reversal”
finding statements introduced to demonstrate their effect on the hearer, and not to prove the truth of the words offered, are admissible to show a defendant’s state of mind
finding statements introduced to demonstrate their effect on the hearer, and not to prove the truth of the words offered, are admissible to show a defendant’s state of mind
all jurors had knowledge of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marquardt, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Udall, Hays, County

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.