Skip to main content

State v. Schmid

Citations

  • 484 P.2d 187
  • 107 Ariz. 191
  • 1971 Ariz. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that counsel’s statement in a motion for continuance was a judicial admission
  • all impanelled jurors had some knowledge of case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Udall, Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Cameron, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.