State v. Savinskiy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting CUE motion as to 1969 RO decision based on its application of VA regulation invalidated by this Court in 1993 because RO in 1969 had applied “the law in effect at that time”
• rejecting CUE motion as to 1969 RO decision based on its application of VA regulation invalidated by this Court in 1993 because RO in 1969 had applied \the law in effect at that time\
• rejecting CUE claim as to 1969 RO decision based on its application of VA regulation invalidated by this Court in 1993 because RO in 1969 had applied “the law in effect at that time”, id. at 137
• “ ‘New legal principles, even when applied retroac- tively, do not apply to cases already closed’ ” (quoting Reyn- oldsville Casket Co. v. Hyde, 514 U. S. 749, 758 (1995); al- teration omitted)
• BVA is bound by VA General Counsel precedent opinions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).