State v. Kilby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[o]nce an attorney is appointed or retained, there can be no interrogation of a defendant con- cerning the events surrounding the crime charged” without involving the attorney (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Kilby
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2025-05-01

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Moran v. Burbine
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
• Texas v. Cobb
  Supreme Court· 2001-04-17· cited 503×
• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• State v. Robertson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-08-03· cited 334×
• Priest v. Pearce
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 177×
• State v. Rodriguez/Buck
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-24· cited 151×
• State v. Newton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-10-27· cited 146×
• State v. Spencer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-02-17· cited 145×
• State v. Haynes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-11-06· cited 129×
• State v. Turnidge
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 129×
• State v. Sparklin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-11-29· cited 122×
• State v. Vondehn
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-07-01· cited 80×
• State v. Ciancanelli
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-09-29· cited 69×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 62×
• State v. Scharf
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-01-22· cited 54×
• State v. Larson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 43×
• State v. Prieto-Rubio
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-04-07· cited 31×
• State v. Ward
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-10-29· cited 30×
• State v. Avila-Nava
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-12-26· cited 28×