Skip to main content

State v. Dinsmore

Citations

  • 147 P.3d 1146
  • 342 Or. 1
  • 2006 Ore. LEXIS 1184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following Spencer and holding that a breath-test result obtained as a result of a violation of Article I, section 11, was “inadmissible for all purposes”
  • applying Spencer to the context of a DUII arrest even though the subsequent prosecution was for crim- inally negligent homicide
  • applying Spencer to the context of a DUII arrest even though the subsequent prosecution was for crim- inally negligent homicide
  • discussing the remedy when a defendant enters a conditional guilty plea as part of a larger plea agreement and prevails on appeal on the issue reserved in the plea
  • distinguishing Newton while recognizing the \coercive effect of the implied consent law\
  • distinguishingNewton while recognizing the “coercive effect of the implied consent law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Carson, Gillette, Durham, Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.