New Mexico Supreme Court· 4/6/1994

State v. Sanders

Citations

872 P.2d 870
117 N.M. 452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that there was no confrontation violation when the excluded evidence did not reflect the witness’s bias, motivation to lie, or credibility
holding that the court did not err in denying admission of the remainder of a twenty-two-page statement of the defendant on which the prosecution had cross-examined the defendant about two particular passages
holding thatthere was no confrontation violation when the excluded evidence did not reflect the witness’s bias, motivation to lie, or credibility
holding that there was no confrontation violation when the excluded evidence did not reflect the witness’s bias, motivation to lie, or credibility
holding that 8 1 because there was only one agreement, there can only be one conviction
concluding that exclusion of evidence concerning the content of a polygraph exam did not constitute error because the jury had sufficient information to evaluate credibility given the witness’s admission that she had lied on an earlier occasion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montgomery, Ransom, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.