New Mexico Supreme Court· 5/22/2009

State v. Barr

Citations

210 P.3d 198
146 N.M. 301
2009 NMSC 024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the primary purpose of the rule of completeness “is to eliminate misleading or deceptive impressions created by creative excerpting”
stating that, in 10 determining harmless error, the reviewing court should consider (1) substantial 11 evidence to support the conviction without reference to the improperly admitted 12 evidence; (2
explaining the difference between 4 the two theories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Serna, Chávez, Maes, Bosson, Daniels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Barr

66 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.