New Mexico Court of Appeals· 12/8/2005

State v. Nichols

Citations

2006 NMCA 17
139 N.M. 72
2006 NMCA 017
128 P.3d 500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the jury, as trier of fact, is 4 entitled to weigh conflicting evidence
recognizing that the jury, as trier of fact, is 5 1 entitled to weigh conflicting evidence
holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting prior statement where there were inconsistencies between the statements and trial testimony regarding the type of abuse because court viewed the statements broadly given the defendant’s charge of fabrication
recognizing 14 that the jury, as trier of fact, is entitled to weigh conflicting evidence
holding that district court did not abuse 14 its discretion in admitting prior statement where there were inconsistencies 15 between the statements and trial testimony regarding the type of abuse because 16 court viewed the statements broadly given the defendant’s charge of fabrication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutin, Wechsler, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.