New Mexico Supreme Court· 7/25/1978
State v. Lankford
Citations
- 582 P.2d 378
- 92 N.M. 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting appellate court ought not disturb fact finder’s resolution of fact
- when testimony is conflicting, such conflict raises questions of fact for a jury to decide
- when testimony is conflicting, such conflict raises questions of fact for a jury to decide
- appellate court must view evidence in light most favorable to state after conviction in trial court
- appellate court must view evidence in light most favorable to state after conviction in trial court
- on review of a conviction, we indulge in all permissible inferences in favor of the verdict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easley, McManus, Payne, Federici
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-05-02· cited 538×
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-11-16· cited 307×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-08-10· cited 233×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-02-05· cited 229×
- State v. ManusNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-05-04· cited 143×
- State v. DedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-11-17· cited 121×
- State v. SandersNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-04-06· cited 118×
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-10-14· cited 106×
- State v. KentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-08-17· cited 85×
- State v. AbeytaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-07-20· cited 71×
- State v. McCraryNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 66×
- State v. HutchinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-03-16· cited 53×
- State v. BrietagNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-03-14· cited 51×
- State v. BankertNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-05-02· cited 47×
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-30· cited 46×
- State v. TYWAYNE H.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-01-29· cited 44×
- State v. James M.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-12-13· cited 44×
- State v. GattisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-11-26· cited 43×
- State v. TovarNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-09-30· cited 42×
- State v. ArandaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-09-11· cited 40×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-03-21· cited 68×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-10-09· cited 35×
- State v. ParkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-06-20· cited 33×
- State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-08-21· cited 29×
- State v. SeatonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-08-23· cited 19×
- State v. EllisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-03-23· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.