New Mexico Supreme Court· 11/16/1994

State v. Apodaca

Citations

887 P.2d 756
118 N.M. 762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an 14 appellate court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, resolving 15 all conflicts and indulging all reasonable inferences in favor of the verdict
stating that, on appeal, the appellate court 2 views the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, resolving all conflicts 3 and indulging all reasonable inferences in favor of the verdict
indicating that on appeal the appellate courts view 16 the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, indulge all permissible 17 inferences, and resolve all conflicts in the evidence in favor of the verdict
reviewing the admission of evidence for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Ransom, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Apodaca

28 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.