Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/31/1981
State v. Sanchez
Citations
- 635 P.2d 1217
- 130 Ariz. 295
- 1981 Ariz. App. LEXIS 540
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reading testimony of witness to jury in absence of defendant found harmless
- remanding for failure to state reasons, but noting 7 STATE v. PEREZ-GUTIERREZ Opinion of the Court that the superior court need only say, “Your crimes were committed against two victims,” to impose consecutive sentences
- “[T]he reading of the testimony of a state’s witness to the jury in [the defendant’s] absence violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Birdsall, Hathaway, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-11· cited 201×
- State v. McCallArizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-09· cited 164×
- State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-19· cited 123×
- State v. HenleyArizona Supreme Court· 1984-05-01· cited 81×
- State v. NieldIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 44×
- State v. SorrellArizona Supreme Court· 1982-04-22· cited 39×
- State v. DixonArizona Supreme Court· 1987-03-19· cited 36×
- State v. BerndtArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-24· cited 29×
- State v. FolkertsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-09-16· cited 27×
- State v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 26×
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-04-22· cited 20×
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1983-11-30· cited 18×
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-09-26· cited 16×
- State v. EisenlordCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-09-20· cited 16×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-05-30· cited 13×
- State v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-04-16· cited 12×
- State v. RosthenhauslerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-09-09· cited 12×
- State v. WoratzeckCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-10-08· cited 11×
- State v. DevineCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-05-22· cited 11×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-06-19· cited 11×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Pedro Rodriquez Bustamante v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonNinth Circuit· 1972-02-07· cited 111×
- State v. FerrariArizona Supreme Court· 1975-10-23· cited 60×
- State v. MulalleyArizona Supreme Court· 1980-09-11· cited 46×
- State v. BustamanteArizona Supreme Court· 1968-11-20· cited 32×
- Pedro Rodriquez Bustamante v. Harold J. Cardwell (Frank A. Eyman), Warden, Arizona State PrisonNinth Circuit· 1974-05-13· cited 31×
- State v. McAlvainArizona Supreme Court· 1969-06-04· cited 26×
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court· 1971-06-11· cited 24×
- State v. IzzoArizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-27· cited 23×
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-12-19· cited 20×
- State v. ColemanArizona Supreme Court· 1979-03-23· cited 17×
- State v. ArmentaArizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-06· cited 17×
- State v. BabineauxCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-10-08· cited 17×
- State v. PerezArizona Supreme Court· 1977-04-11· cited 16×
- State v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-04-19· cited 8×
- State v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-09-16· cited 7×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-01-30· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.