State v. Armenta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he reading of the testimony of a state’s witness to the jury in [the defendant’s] absence violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation.”
• “In order to find a waiver it must be shown that the defendant had personal notice of the proceeding, that he was aware that he had a right to attend and that he had been informed that the proceeding would go forward in his absence should he fail to appear.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bible
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
• State v. Swoopes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-19· cited 123×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-07-31· cited 41×
• State v. Collins
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-04-23· cited 17×
• State v. Perez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-04-11· cited 16×
• State v. Perez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-07-20· cited 9×
• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-07-22· cited 7×
• State v. Jovenal
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-11-01· cited 7×
• State v. Howland
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-09-21· cited 5×
• State of Arizona v. Samuel Wayne Swoopes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-19
• State of Arizona v. Dewayne Esaw
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-07-23

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Allen
  Supreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
• Pedro Rodriquez Bustamante v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State Prison
  Ninth Circuit· 1972-02-07· cited 111×
• State v. Tacon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-09-23· cited 47×
• Tacon v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 43×
• Van Akins v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden, Arizona State Prison
  Ninth Circuit· 1974-06-21· cited 11×
• State v. Thornburg
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-10-31· cited 10×