State v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• having found no fundamental error, a claimed error unsupported by a timely objection was not considered on appeal
• explaining the “range of discussion and argumentation is very wide and matters of common knowledge may be referred to”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilhelm v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
• State v. Smith
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 56×
• State v. Trotter
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-10-24· cited 48×
• State v. Sullivan
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-15· cited 47×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-07-31· cited 41×
• State v. Thomas
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-11-15· cited 36×
• State v. Jaramillo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-10· cited 26×
• State v. Moore
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 25×
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-06-30· cited 24×
• State v. Webb
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-01-09· cited 21×
• State v. Mitchell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-03-13· cited 17×
• Rodriguez v. Williams
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-10-05· cited 15×
• State v. Barnett
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-01-29· cited 12×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-06-19· cited 11×
• State v. Clark
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-01-16· cited 8×
• State v. Clow
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 8×
• State v. Zaerr
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 7×
• State v. Padilla
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-05-09· cited 6×