Skip to main content
· 9/9/1985

State v. Rosthenhausler

Citations

  • 711 P.2d 625
  • 147 Ariz. 486
  • 1985 Ariz. App. LEXIS 667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding it was not error for trial court to grant state’s request that defendant roll up his sleeve to reveal a tattoo
  • finding no constitutional violation where defendant was required to reveal tattoo
  • finding no constitutional violation where defendant was required to reveal tattoo
  • statutory exception for inoperable firearms not an element of crime involving deadly weapon; burden to show inoperability on defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsall, Howard, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.