State v. Rowell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in determining whether a person has abandoned a protected possessory or privacy interest, we examine the totality of the circumstances, as known at the time of the search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Soto-Navarro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-10· cited 14×
• State v. Bunch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-01· cited 4×
• State v. Vanburen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-14· cited 3×
• State v. Campbell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-28· cited 2×
• United States v. Williams
  District of Columbia· 2023-04-11
• State v. Hewitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-11-27

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 279×
• State v. Tanner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 194×
• State v. Atkinson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 164×
• State v. Kock
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-09-30· cited 91×
• State v. Tucker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 61×
• State v. Hoover
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-11-25· cited 61×
• State v. Pidcock
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-02· cited 41×
• State v. Cook
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 39×
• State v. Connally
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 32×
• State v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-08· cited 13×
• State v. Linville
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-10-22· cited 8×
• State v. Pierce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-25· cited 5×
• State v. Pierce
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-05-14· cited 4×
• State v. Alexander
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17· cited 2×
• State v. Garoutte
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-11-21· cited 2×
• State v. Delaney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-10· cited 1×