Oregon Supreme Court· 9/25/1984

State v. Atkinson

Citations

688 P.2d 832
298 Or. 1
1984 Ore. LEXIS 1727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a policy may be adopted and uniformly administered to inventory the contents of vehicles in order to protect private property and for ancillary purposes
holding that a policy may be adopted and uniformly administered to inventory the contents of vehicles in order to protect private property and for ancillary purposes
holding that an inventory “must be conducted pursuant to a properly authorized administrative program”
holding that the degree to which inventorying officers may scrutinize items is constitutionally limited
explaining that this court is “a judicial, not a legislative body,” and that it “is not our function to decide” matters of policy
explaining that this court is “a judicial, not a legislative body,” and that it “is not our function to decide” matters of policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Peterson, Lent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.