State v. Bunch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “uncertainty as to * * * ownership does not translate into a subjective belief that [the property] was lost”
• “Abandonment requires an unequivocal manifestation of an intention to relinquish all constitutionally protected interests in the affected prop- erty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-09-16· cited 3×
• State v. Laney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-23· cited 3×
• State v. Ruiz-Espinosa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-02· cited 1×
• State v. Harmon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-12-20

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Owens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
• State v. Tanner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 194×
• State v. Turnidge
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 129×
• State v. Tucker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 61×
• State v. Morton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-03-05· cited 42×
• State v. Pidcock
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-02· cited 41×
• State v. Cook
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 39×
• State v. Knox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-26· cited 22×
• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-05-27· cited 19×
• State v. Jepson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-19· cited 13×
• State v. Standish
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-01-12· cited 12×
• State v. McKee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-22· cited 9×
• State v. McClatchey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-20· cited 7×
• State v. Rowell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-01· cited 6×
• State v. Pilgrim
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-09· cited 6×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-03· cited 5×