Oregon Supreme Court· 10/18/2001

State v. Cook

Citations

34 P.3d 156
332 Or. 601
2001 Ore. LEXIS 803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

looking to defendant’s statements and conduct before alleged search to determine whether defendant had abandoned constitutionally protected interests in property at the time of the search
the state bears the burden of proving that any alleged abandonment of a constitutionally protected interest occurred before a warrantless search and seizure
“[T]he determination whether a defendant has relinquished a constitutionally protected interest in an article of property involves both factual and legal questions [.]”
“[F]or constitutional purposes, the question to be resolved * * * is whether the defendant’s statements and conduct demonstrated that he relinquished all constitutionally protected interests in the articles of property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Leeson, Riggs, De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.