State v. Garoutte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the defendant had no privacy rights in the use or occupancy of a stolen car he was driving once he was lawfully removed from the car

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hite
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-03-02· cited 12×
• State v. Rowell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-01· cited 6×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Leon
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 279×
• State v. Tanner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 194×