United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an informal request for recusal unaccompanied by the requisite affidavit fails to comply with Section 144
• explaining that defendant bears burden of production and persuasion in suppression hearing in absence of well-defined exceptions
• holding that the prosecution did not need to authenticate the signature of the attorney general on the authorizing memorandum attached to the wiretap application where the defendants did not \allege or prove any facts tending to indicate some government impropriety\
• setting out general rule that the movant bears burden of persuasion as well as production subject to certain well-defined exceptions, including (1) warrantless arrest, (2
• setting out general rule that the movant bears burden of persuasion as well as production subject to certain well-defined exceptions, including (1) warrantless arrest, (2
• applying well- established principle that the burden of proof rests upon the movant in suppression hearings to motion alleging improper authorization for wiretap

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).