Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/28/1992
State v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 223 Conn. 127
- 613 A.2d 211
- 1992 Conn. LEXIS 251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding reasonable expectation of privacy on basis of information presented in search warrant affidavit and statements that defendant made to police before search warrant was issued
- affidavit stated that informant has “also given information in prior cases that . . . led to arrests arid convictions”
- informant whose information led to “ ‘arrests of several people for drug related offenses’ ” deemed rehable
- statement in warrant affidavit that confidential informant saw defendant carrying revolver before shooting was entitled to reliability because it was corroborated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Borden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 957×
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-06-28· cited 164×
- State v. DeFuscoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-02-23· cited 96×
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-18· cited 94×
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-01· cited 82×
- State v. RaguseoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-23· cited 72×
- State v. SalzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-22· cited 69×
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-20· cited 66×
- State v. RespassSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-15· cited 52×
- State v. ZarickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-17· cited 45×
- State v. RussoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-02-19· cited 39×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-31· cited 30×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-07-22· cited 22×
- Martin v. BradyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-07-24· cited 21×
- State v. MordowanecSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-01-22· cited 19×
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-09-07· cited 16×
- State v. BolanosConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-06-20· cited 16×
- State v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-01-03· cited 15×
- State v. IvesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-02-21· cited 14×
- State v. NazarioConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-08-01· cited 12×
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-26· cited 3,191×
- United States v. James Edward Colkley, United States of America v. Jamison Henry JohnsonFourth Circuit· 1990-03-27· cited 351×
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-17· cited 255×
- Seath v. Regulations & Permits AdministrationSupreme Court· 1983-08-23· cited 251×
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-10-02· cited 199×
- State v. BartonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-16· cited 178×
- United States v. Jorge Enrique ArangoTenth Circuit· 1990-08-28· cited 164×
- United States v. Carlos Garcia and Jose Luis GarciaSeventh Circuit· 1990-03-19· cited 160×
- Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 149×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.