Connecticut Appellate Court· 7/24/2001
Martin v. Brady
Citations
- 64 Conn. App. 433
- 780 A.2d 961
- 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 384
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that allegations that police pushed plaintiff to ground and smashed windows and doors did not constitute egregious conduct and, therefore, failed to state a claim under Article First, Sections Seven and Nine of the Connecticut Constitution
- holding the officers’ conduct was not sufficiently egregious to warrant the availability of a private cause of action for a violation of the Connecticut Constitution, thereby narrowing the availability of the remedy
- analyzing whether the facts alleged in the plaintiff’s complaint “are sufficiently egregious to allow him to pursue a separate tort action against the defendants” under Binette
- “We are not persuaded that these allegations, if true, rise to the level of egregious misconduct. They are a far remove from the allegations of misconduct that underlay Binette.”
- in the absence of any allegation other than the specific claim that the defendants acted in their official capacity, \the form in which the plaintiff cited the defendants does not matter\
- “Apart from the illegality of the entry, the plaintiff complains of having been pushed to the ground on one occasion and of having windows and doors smashed on another occasion. We are not persuaded that these allegations, if true, rise to the legal of egregious misconduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Martin v. BradySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-13· cited 72×
- Hultman v. BlumenthalConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-01-15· cited 22×
- Devine v. FusaroConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-07-06· cited 7×
- Hanna v. Capitol Region Mental Health CenterConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-12-24· cited 6×
- Waller v. City of MiddletownD. Connecticut· 2014-09-29· cited 3×
- Martin v. BradySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-09-20· cited 2×
- Kyle Conklin and A.C., a Minor, by Kyle Conklin, Her Father, Next Friend and Legal Guardian, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-03-25
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-12· cited 384×
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-03· cited 212×
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-20· cited 205×
- Binette v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-10· cited 161×
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-25· cited 160×
- Antinerella v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-31· cited 149×
- Sentner v. Board of Trustees of Regional Community CollegesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-06-09· cited 93×
- Reynolds v. SofferSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-01-27· cited 72×
- ATC Partnership v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-14· cited 62×
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-07-28· cited 48×
- Cooper v. Delta Chi Housing Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-04-16· cited 37×
- SLI International Corp. v. CrystalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-27· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.