Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2/19/2002

State v. Russo

Citations

259 Conn. 436
790 A.2d 1132
2002 Conn. LEXIS 60

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the legislature did not intend to limit law enforcement’s access to prescription records “because if it had, it easily could have expressed that intent” in the statute
finding that pharmacy statute safeguards privacy interests by restricting access to controlled substance records to a limited class of persons
finding that pharmacy statute safeguards privacy interests by restricting access to controlled substance records to a limited class of persons
finding that pharmacy statute safeguards privacy interests by restricting access to controlled substance records to a limited class of persons
“[P]rescription records may contain information of a private nature regarding a person’s physical or mental health.”
had legislature intended to limit access to certain records by law enforcement personnel, it easily could have expressed such an intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Palmer, Sullivan, Vertefeuille

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.